The Tyranny of Technology.

Nearly all writers use computers to record their words. I do. But should we consider that computers are too intrusive in the creative process? I remember some years ago hearing an editor discuss this. He stated that he could always tell when a computer had been used by a writer. He claimed to see more verbosity and less focus in the writing.
Is contemporary technology anymore intrusive than the typewriter that replaced the pen? Was a pen more intrusive than the quill it replaced? If we are modern writers we should not reject the technological advances that make writing – always a difficult endeavour – a little easier.
However, we should always guard against excess verbosity and a lack of focus. It is easy to be seduced by a block of text and feel that it is sacrosanct and should not be re-arranged, cut or altered for increased effect. Yet, too often the writer, almost with a sense of relief, reviews their manuscript and with a sense of self satisfaction cloned with a sense of egocentricity, defies anyone to alter, cut or change it. Yet, every writer must bear in mind that if any reader of their work finds a question, a lack of clarity, or a poorly phrased metaphor then that criticism is one of the most valid the writer will ever hear. The writer should not blindly champion their words, but reflect on how and where those words can be improved to focus the clarity and effect.
This is just a minor point. What I really want to explore are the intrusions that permeate our society as so many of these are derived from our technology. Writers need to create an undisturbed trance state in which to allow language, ideas and imagination realization. Yet, in our offices, or at our computer desks, it is too easy to respond to the `ding’ of an arriving email, to be seduced into the secretarial aspects of digital technology. We complete these tasks, give in to the temptation of our digital media and suffer the illusion of getting stuff done. Many of us are efficient functionaries at these tasks, but this is an avoidance activity, as efficient as a trip to our favourite café or pub. We have compromised our creativity. Our writing cannot be as good without isolation, without entering the sacramental area of creativity. I know my goddess of creativity will not come and sit on my shoulder and dictate to me if I’m distracted by the tyranny of our technology.
I was reminded of this by an item on CBC radio a few weeks ago when Guy Gavriel Kay and Steven Heighton discussed their writing in a collection of essays “Finding the Words” – a fundraiser for PEN Canada.
So, if you want to write effectively, don’t get seduced by your social and digital media!

Democracy (?)

Stephen Harper's majority raises some disturbing criteria for Canada's democracy. He has obtained a majority of seats with less than 40% of the vote. In other words 60% of the voters did not vote for Harper's Conservatives. Across Canada 7,867,870 people voted Liberal, NDP or Green. 5,832,401 voted Conservative. This is a difference of over 2 million votes. Harper does not have a mandate from the people of Canada to push through alienating legislation which will further damage the democratic principles of our society. I am appalled that a Prime Minister who was found in contempt of parliament has now been elected with a majority of seats which give's him four years of full-blown Conservative rule. Many view him as Canada's George Bush and Naomi Klein recently tweeted that a "hair-raising shock doctrine is coming our way." Harper now has a mandate to pursue cuts to welfare, make further cuts to the CBC, continue to advocate environmental destruction in order to maintain the economy, lower corporate tax rates, build larger prisons, despite a falling crime rate, and purchase unproven new jets from the US despite the advent of drone technology which will make them quickly obsolete.
Canada needs proportional representation. Elizabeth May and Jack Layton advocate this. I just hope that they are able to hold Harper in check, despite his majority. If you're interested in supporting proportional representation click here.